Most roof decisions are made from a single inspection: someone walks the roof, takes photos, and writes a recommendation. That snapshot matters, but it misses the most useful thing an owner can know — how the roof got here.
A roof that has looked the same for eight years and a roof that has degraded sharply in the last two can photograph almost identically today. Their futures are very different. The first may be a coating candidate; the second is telling you something about drainage, traffic, or mechanical penetrations that a coating will not fix.
Through our Pulsix research, we trace each roof section from historical satellite imagery and track it over time: surface reflectance, ponding patterns, new equipment and penetrations, patches, and repairs. The result is a degradation curve for each section rather than a single condition grade.
The history does not replace a site visit; it focuses it. We use it to decide where to core, what to photograph, and whether repair, restoration, or replacement belongs in the lifecycle plan. Then the field documentation from our own crews — photos and readings checked against manufacturer references — closes the loop.
You can see roof sections modeled alongside cooling and power systems in our public data center case study.
Pulsix is not affiliated with the campus owner or operator. Every figure in the case study is labeled observed, modeled, or owner-required, and nothing here is an assessment of how the facility is actually run.
Want this in your inbox monthly? Subscribe to the Zebrix Insights Newsletter, or talk to our team.